近15年谷歌每年搜索量最高球员：C罗10次断崖领先，梅西仅1次（近15年谷歌年度搜索冠军球员：C罗10次遥遥领先，梅西仅一次登顶）

Clarifying network capabilities

It looks like the network might be enabled, but I’m not entirely sure. Based on the instructions, I should assume it's enabled unless told otherwise, which allows me to run a script to query pytrends. However, there’s a risk if pytrends isn't installed. It might be better to ask the user if they want me to verify the information with Google Trends and create a chart or summarize why CR7 dominates searches. I could also provide reasons like his social media presence and World Cup wins.Planning Google Trends analysis

I’m thinking of pulling Google Trends data from 2009-2024 for players like Ronaldo, Messi, Neymar, and others, to determine yearly winners. However, I need to be cautious because Google Trends normalizes data between 0-100 for each query, so I can only compare terms within the same query. It can be tricky since it caps at five terms. I might build a script that uses pytrends to gather daily or weekly data and implement a pairwise tournament approach. I’ll compile a candidate list of players to include.Clarifying user request

I’m noticing that trending athletes might include names that aren’t widely recognized anymore, but that seems safe. We should probably use the Plan tool for this multi-step task, but the user has only shared a headline, so they may want a brief post. I’ll ask a quick clarifying question and give them options: 1) Verify data and create a year-by-year table, 2) Write a short article or Weibo post, 3) Make a chart. I'll also include some caveats about Google Trends data comparability and limits.Estimating search trends

I’m considering that I could share some approximate trends from public reports, noting that CR7 was the most searched athlete globally from 2016 to 2024, with Messi seeing a spike in 2022, Neymar being popular in the 2010s, and Mbappé showing interest in 2018. However, I need to be cautious and avoid stating specific counts unless I can verify them. It’s probably best to keep the conclusions tentative and not use definitive numbers.